Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:
Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT
In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:
- come viene usata la parola
- frequenza di utilizzo
- è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
- opzioni di traduzione delle parole
- esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
- etimologia
Cosa (chi) è ukase - definizione
PROCLAMATION THAT HAS THE FORCE OF LAW
Ukaz; Oukaze; Oekaze; Ukaze; Ukazes
![Council of Ministers of the USSR]], 1964.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Decree of Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union, 15.10.1964 - Alexey Kosygin.jpggarf.jpg?width=200 "Council of Ministers of the USSR]], 1964.")
ukase
n.
edict
to issue a ukase
Ukase
·noun In Russia, a published proclamation or imperial order, having the force of law.
ukase
[ju:'ke?z]
¦ noun
1. (in tsarist Russia) a decree which had the force of law.
2. an arbitrary or peremptory command.
Origin
from Russ. ukaz 'ordinance, edict', from ukazat? 'show, decree'.
Wikipedia
Ukase
In Imperial Russia, a ukase () or ukaz (Russian: указ [ʊˈkas]) was a proclamation of the tsar, government, or a religious leader (patriarch) that had the force of law. "Edict" and "decree" are adequate translations using the terminology and concepts of Roman law.
From the Russian term, the word ukase has entered the English language with the meaning of "any proclamation or decree; an order or regulation of a final or arbitrary nature".
Esempi dal corpus di testo per ukase
1. But the president is right in framing his new policy as a ukase to Iraq‘s government: We are buying you time, and not much of it, for you to dash to competence concerning security matters.
2. Bush‘s ukase applies to all traffickers in Iraqi oil –– as long as their loot finds its way, by hook or crook, into the coffers of "United States persons or entities." Bush declares flatly that any "judicial process" launched against these protected entities –– not excluding criminal proceedings for, say, fraud, corruption, extortion, even murder –– "shall be deemed null and void." But what if some rogue nation still clinging to the outmoded principle of law and order tries to take Bush‘s cronies to court?